CubaBrief: Honoring Cuban salsa icon Celia Cruz’s entire legacy on the centenary of her birth. Calling out apologists of Fidel Castro continuing their cult of personality for the communist dictator
On October 21, 1925, Úrsula Hilaria Celia de la Caridad Cruz Alfonso was born in Cuba. On the centenary anniversary of her birth millions of fans around the World are celebrating her life this year. She is better known by her stage name, Celia Cruz, the Queen of Salsa.
On Saturday, August 9, 2025, a Celia Cruz Celebration was held at the Summer stage at the Rumsey Playfield in Central Park in New York City. Below is an excerpt from the event.

Celia Cruz on the U.S. Quarter

Last year on August 12, 2024 the U.S. Mint began to circulate her image on the U.S. quarter. under the American Women Quarters Program. One hundred years after her birth she remains a cultural icon, but her legacy is contested by some, and misrepresented by others.

When she passed due to a long illness in 2003, the mourning for Celia was nearly universal, except in her homeland Cuba where the official media printed a small note on her passing. It recognized Celia as an “important Cuban performer who popularized our country’s music in the United States,” it went on to say that “during the last four decades, she was systematically active in campaigns against the Cuban revolution generated in the United States.”

A U.S. institution is failing to remember her entire legacy.

Unfortunately, the Smithsonian Institution’s March 5, 2020 video titled “Why Is Celia Cruz Called the Queen of Salsa? #BecauseOfHerStory” does not explain the Castro regime’s hostility toward Celia Cruz.

The Smithsonian failed to mention her refusal to bow to Fidel Castro, her legacy defending freedom of expression, or the high price she paid.

Ariana A. Curtis, curator at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture, is interviewed by a student identified as Mincy, who conflates Celia’s history with the immigration experience in America. Celia was a Cuban exile barred from returning to her homeland by the Castro dictatorship, and her music is still banned in Cuba today. This is the misleading portion of the interview that describes her departure from Cuba:

Ariana A. Curtis: Because especially during the early 1960s when she left, that was right after the Cuban Revolution, you know. And so Cuba was in the news a lot about politics, and about socialism, and about military things. But she really wanted to be able to show this “other side” of Cuba, right. The arts and culture side. And so she definitely used her style, sort of like satin dresses with the ruffles, and like these long trains.

Mincy: People migrate here and they tend to change their names and change who they are  so that they can get jobs or so that they can get opportunities. So they hide that part of themselves in order to like grow in this country, it’s so important that we have an example that Celia Cruz did not hide herself.”

Setting the record straight

This omits much of Celia’s past and could be interpreted as an Orwellian rewriting that the Castro government would embrace because it accomplishes something the Queen of Salsa never did: it conceals who she truly was. And this process had been ongoing for several years prior to this interview. This is concerning since the Smithsonian Institution is funded by American taxpayers and should not be producing such bad content to advance a false narrative.

Celia decided to live and perform in freedom, which meant leaving Cuba during the Castro dictatorship. Fidel Castro attempted to force the salsa singer to pay him homage, but she refused. Salserísimo Perú, a Youtube site founded by three Peruvian journalists to disseminate knowledge on salsa and tropical music, provides a more comprehensive and accurate history than the Smithsonian Institution. The following is an account of Celia Cruz’s first “encounter” with Fidel Castro.

“In the early months of 1959, Celia Cruz was hired to sing with a pianist at the house of the Cuban businessman Miguel Angel Quevedo.  Quevedo owned the magazine Bohemia, the most influential in Cuba and who had supported the revolution in the last few years.  The guerrilla movement with a certain Fidel Castro in front proclaimed in Santiago the beginning of the revolution. At that moment Celia enjoyed great popularity for “Yebero Moderno”, “Tu voz” and “Burundanga” songs she had recorded with the Sonora Matancera. As a guest artist of Rogelio Martinez’s group the Guarachera (Celia) was free to accept other contracts as a soloist. This allowed her to show her talent on different radio stations in Havana, and perform in Mexico, Venezuela, and Peru. Since the regime of Fidel took power, it had begun to systematically seize businesses, radio and television stations. [Fidel Castro speaking: ‘The revolution was something like a hope and that joy, possibly, prevented us from thinking all that we still had to do.’ For the Guarechera, Fidel was ending free expression and the arts in her country.  The night of the show in the home of Quevedo, Celia was singing standing next to the pianist,  when suddenly the guests started to run to the front door of the house. Fidel Castro had arrived.  Neither she nor the pianist moved and continued singing. Suddenly, Quevedo approached Celia and told her that Fidel wanted to meet her because in his guerrilla days, when he cleaned his rifle he was listening to Burundanga. Celia replied that she had been hired to sing next to the piano, and that was her place. If Fidel wanted to meet her, he would have to come to her.  But the commandant did not do that.”

Castro barred Celia Cruz from visiting her dying mother

Since Celia Cruz refused to bow to the new dictator, and wanted to continue to live the life of a free artist, she had to leave Cuba on July 15, 1960. However, when her mom was ill she tried to return to see her in 1962, but was barred from entering the country by Fidel Castro. When her mother died Celia was again blocked by the dictatorship from attending her funeral. Because she was not an active supporter of the regime, her music was banned in Cuba.

 

She was finally able to return to Cuba in 1990, but not on territory controlled by the Castro dictatorship, when she played a concert for Cuban employees who worked on the U.S. Guantanamo Naval Base, and collected Cuban soil that would be entombed with her in 2003.

Music still banned in Cuba today

Regime apologists and their agents of influence have attempted to pretend that things have changed with regards to artistic freedom.

On August 8, 2012 BBC News reported that Cuba’s ban on anti-Castro musicians had been quietly lifted and on August 10 the BBC correspondent in Cuba, Sarah Rainsford, tweeted that she had been given names of forbidden artists by the central committee and the internet was a buzz that the ban on anti-Castro musicians had been quietly lifted. Others soon followed reporting on the news. The stories specifically mentioned Celia Cruz as one of the artists whose music would return to Cuban radio.

There was only one problem. It was not true. Diario de Cuba reported on August 21, 2012 that Tony Pinelli, a well known musician and radio producer, distributed an e-mail in which Rolando Álvarez, the national director of the Cuban Institute of Radio and Television Instituto Cubano de Radio y Televisión (ICRT) confirmed that the music of the late Celia Cruz would continue to be banned. The e-mail clearly stated: “All those who had allied with the enemy, who acted against our families, like Celia Cruz, who went to sing at the Guantanamo Base, the ICRT arrogated to itself the right, quite properly, not to disseminate them on Cuban radio ”

Celia  is in good company. Other major Cuban artists who have had their music banned by the Castro regime are Olga Guillot, Rolando Lecuona, Paquito D’Rivera, Arturo Sandoval,  Israel Cachao López, Ramón “Mongo” Santamaría, Mario Bauza, Arsenio Rodríguez, Willy Chirino, and Gloria Estefan.

Cuban cultural genocide

According to the 2004 book Shoot the Singer!: Music Censorship Today edited by Marie Korpe, there is growing concern that post-revolution generations in Cuba are growing up without knowing or hearing censored musicians such as Celia Cruz, Olga Guillot, and the long list above. This could lead to a loss of Cuban identity in future generations. This approach has been referred to as a Cuban cultural genocide, denying generations of Cubans their history.

The Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture should provide the complete story of Celia Cruz, rather than the politically correct version currently presented on YouTube. Meanwhile, supporters of freedom and beautiful music may commemorate her entire life and legacy through her music, and speaking up for jailed Cuban artists today, who like Celia spoke out for freedom, such as prisoners of conscience Maykel “Osorbo” Castillo Pérez and Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara.

Castro regime apologists, including groups based in the U.S. such as the People’s Forum, are observing the 99th anniversary of Fidel Castro’s birth. Notes from the Cuban Exile Quarter examines how much better the World would be if the communist dictator had never been born.
The positive legacy of Celia Cruz that is demonstrated the world over will long eclipse the death and misery filled one left by Fidel Castro.
Billboard,  August 9, 2025

Celia Cruz Centennial Celebration to Light Up Central Park with Cuban All-Star Lineup

Cuban All-Stars to Celebrate Celia Cruz’s 100th Birthday

In honor of the legendary Celia Cruz’s birth in 1925, a star-studded lineup of Cuban artists will come together on Saturday (Aug. 9) at Capital One City Parks Foundation SummerStage at Rumsey Playfield in Central Park for a free evening of music, dance, and cultural celebration. In association with Telemundo 47, salsa performer Issac Delgado, Grammy-winning artist Aymee Nuviola, percussion powerhouse Brenda Navarrete, and Afro-Cuban jazz singer Melvis Santa will headline this tribute that celebrates the Queen of Salsa. Fans can also warm up with a free salsa class at 7:00 pm EST, courtesy of Talia Productions dancers.

Capital Research Center, August 13, 2025
InfluenceWatch

Fidel Castro’s 99th birthday and those who celebrate

By Ken Braun

He died in 2016, leaving many detractors, prisons full of political prisoners and . . . some deluded fans.

Today would be the 99th birthday of Cuban communist dictator and revolutionary Fidel Castro. He died in 2016, leaving many detractors, prisons full of political prisoners and . . . some deluded fans.

Justin Trudeau, then the Canadian prime minister, offered a conspicuously warm eulogy:

I know my father was very proud to call him a friend and I had the opportunity to meet Fidel when my father passed away. It was also a real honour to meet his three sons and his brother President Raúl Castro during my recent visit to Cuba.

On behalf of all Canadians, Sophie and I offer our deepest condolences to the family, friends and many, many supporters of Mr. Castro. We join the people of Cuba today in mourning the loss of this remarkable leader.

Since 1969, more than 10,000 similarly obtuse Americans have shown their solidarity with Cuban communism by joining the Venceremos Brigade.

According to the InfluenceWatch profile:

The Venceremos Brigade is a radical-left activist group that organizes trips to communist-ruled Cuba as a way for sympathetic Americans to demonstrate their solidarity with the country’s government and their opposition to related United States government policies. As of 2024, it is a fiscally-sponsored project of The People’s Forum, a charitable nonprofit, and was formerly a project of the Alliance for Global Justice. The word “Venceremos” translates as “we shall overcome,” and Venceremos Brigade participants are commonly referred to as brigadistas.

Founded in 1969 by members of the radical New Left activist group Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), the original objective of the Venceremos Brigade was to help Cuba produce 10 million tons of sugar during the 1970 harvest, though this goal was ultimately not achieved.

And by “not achieved” it meant:

The 1970 Cuban harvest failed to produce 10 million tons of sugar. A U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) memorandum reported that it had yielded 8.5 million metric tons, which was an all-time record for the country but still 1.5 million tons short of the government’s publicized goal. The report noted that the additional resources which had been diverted to assist with the harvest had negatively impacted other sectors of the Cuban economy—such as construction and manufacturing—and speculated that the increased sugar yields would probably strike “many Cubans as a hollow victory, without benefit to the population.”

According to a 1974 article in the New York Times, over-saturation of the global sugar market depressed prices to such an extent that the 1970 Cuban harvest was one of the least-profitable in the country’s history up to that point. The extra manpower and other resources devoted to the harvest had resulted in a 25 percent drop in milk production and a 38 percent drop in steel production, among other negative economic impacts. The article concluded that “however one looked at it,” the effort had been a “disaster.”  Nevertheless, some prominent brigadistas criticized what they called “the predictable American habit of defining ‘success’ in terms of quantity,” and argued that the harvest had not been a “qualitative” failure because of the “degree of commitment, revolutionary consciousness and energy to work” that the effort had demonstrated.

But yesterday’s revolutionary communists have a way of turning into today’s regime politicians and leaders of lefty advocacy nonprofits:

Numerous prominent left-wing academics, activists, and political figures have been affiliated with the Venceremos Brigade, including Los Angeles Mayor and former U.S. Representative Karen Bass (D-CA),  former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (D), prominent labor union official and Clinton administration appointee Karen Nussbaum, former Spelman College and Bennett College president Johnnetta Cole, Georgetown University professor and former Dissent magazine co-editor Michael Kazin, former Center for Constitutional Rights president Michael Ratner, Pueblo Action Alliance director Julia Bernal,  and former member of the domestic terrorist group May 19th Communist Organization and Thousand Currents board member Susan Rosenberg.

Ramparts, the flagship New Left publication of the late 1960s and early 1970s, also featured a hilarious report from a brigadista who could not distinguish between press freedom and propaganda.

 

According to the InfluenceWatch profile of Ramparts:

“A Letter from Camp Venceremos,” posted in the August 1970 Ramparts, provided another positive portrayal of the Cuban dictatorship. The author, Chris Camarano, was a member of the first Venceremos Brigade [. . .] Camarano wrote this of her impressions of Cuban communist dictator Fidel Castro:

Fidel is totally fantastic—completely overwhelming. He is direct, candid, immediate, humble, brilliant, audacious. Some of us were able to have an informal rap with him and he told us wonderful stories about the fighting in the Sierra Maestra. Lots of funny incidents came rushing out. Jesus, he was so lit up—could have gone on for hours, I’m sure. 

She also wrote that the Cuban press was superior to the American media:

The news reports here show even Movement news service in the States to be truly for shit. There are zillions of important things happening all over the world every day that are never mentioned in our press—especially Latin American and Far Eastern news. Of course we all knew this before-but even the most skeptical of us never understood the degree to which everything is sifted, selected, distorted.

The reports here are fantastic—extensive, detailed coverage of even the smallest events in all countries. Radio broadcasts last for hours and offer not only good reportage but a lot of analysis. As a result, the general level of political consciousness here is something not to be believed. 

In addition to Venceremos Brigade and Ramparts, other InfluenceWatch profiles touching on the Castro regime and Americans sympathetic to it include those for the Weather Underground, Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Institute for Policy Studies, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

 

Ken Braun

Ken Braun is CRC’s senior investigative researcher and authors profiles for InfluenceWatch.org and the Capital Research magazine.

https://capitalresearch.org/article/fidel-castro-birthday/

Notes from the Cuban Exile Quarter, August 13, 2025

Imagine what Cuba would be like today if Fidel Castro was never born.

Totalitarians and aspiring totalitarians today celebrate the birth of Fidel Castro over social media, but others try to imagine what state Cuba would be in now if it weren’t for him.

What if Fidel Castro had never been born and his 66-year tyranny had never existed? Let us compare where Cuba was before 1959 to where it is now and speculate on “what might have been.”

The economy
In 1959, in terms of per-capita GDP, Cuba was second to Chile and was doing better than Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, and Panama. In 2015, Cuba lagged well behind the other four countries. It would be fair to say that in economic terms, despite billions in Soviet and Venezuelan subsidies, the past six decades have been a disaster for Cuba.

Cuban death toll

There are tens of thousands of Cubans who would be alive today if Fidel Castro had never been born.
“University of Hawaii historian R. J. Rummel, who made a career out of studying what he termed “democide,” the killing of people by their own government, reported in 1987 that credible estimates of the Castro regime’s death toll ran from 35,000 to 141,000, with a median of 73,000.”
Democracy restored in a post-Batista Cuba
Many of the leaders of the July 26th movement, who did the heavy lifting in the fighting in the field, and lobbying Washington DC to place an arms embargo on Fulgencio Batista in the spring of 1958, authentically wanted a democratic restoration in Cuba. As did the majority of the Cuban people. This is why Fidel Castro lied systematically through the 1950s and into 1960 denying that he was a communist and claiming to respect civil liberties and democracy.
While Fidel Castro paid lip service to civil liberties, and locked up his compatriots, who had complained that communists were infiltrating the revolution as slanderers, he carried out the consolidation of power and formed a communist totalitarian dictatorship.
Fidel Castro turned Cuba’s diplomatic corps into a weapon of subversion and violence, recruited Nazis to train his repressive apparatus in the mid 1960s, and linked up with cocaine traffickers in an effort to target the soft underbelly of the United States.
Without Fidel Castro, the democratic transition in a post-Batista Cuba would not have been side-lined and the old democratic order that had done pioneering work on international human rights would have been restored.
Nicaragua
If Fidel Castro had never been born, then Daniel Ortega and the Sandinistas would not have taken power in 1979. Without the assistance of the Cuban secret police to take over Nicaragua again in 2007 and turn it into the dictatorship it is today with Cuban advisers and Nicaraguans fleeing the country.
Venezuela
 
If Fidel Castro was never born, then Hugo Chavez would not have had a mentor and the assistance of the Cuban secret police to take over Venezuela and turn it into the dictatorship it is today with Nicolas Maduro and the humanitarian crisis threatening the region.
Human rights in Cuba

 

If Fidel Castro had never come into existence, then Cubans would not be going to prison for not sufficiently mourning the dictator’s death in 2016, or worse yet providing a negative assessment of the regime he created. Thousands of men and women would not have spent decades in Cuban prisons for their political beliefs.
Opposition leaders Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, and Harold Cepero Escalante would not have been killed on July 22, 2012 by Castro’s state security agents. Nor the games played by Castro to invite the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture in order to get positive media coverage but then not follow through. There would not have been the massacre of refugees slaughtered by Castro regime agents for trying to flee Cuba.
Education
Cuba in 1953 had the fourth lowest illiteracy rate in Latin America with an illiteracy rate that was 23.6%. Costa Rica’s at the time was 20.6%, Chile’s was 19.6%. and Argentina’s was the lowest at 13.6%.  The rest of Latin America showed similar or greater gains without sacrificing civil liberties.
There are also great concerns about the Cuban educational system today. First the issue of a system of education being transformed by the Castro dictatorship into a system of indoctrination and secondly following the collapse of Soviet subsidies the material decline of the entire system along with shortages of teachers.
Without Fidel Castro intervention Cuba was on track to having a first class education system without sacrificing civil liberties. Now it has neither.

Healthcare

Castro regime officials decided early on in the COVID-19 pandemic that they wanted to “be the first country in the world to vaccinate their whole population with their own vaccines” and were willing to let Cubans die while they developed their domestic vaccines instead of importing them, including from their allies Russia and China, in order to advance their “healthcare superpower” narrative.
According to official regime statistics, by August 2022 COVID had killed 8,529 of Cuba’s 11m people. But The Economist model estimates that the true death toll was up to 62,000 Cubans. This is not the first time that Havana has under reported numbers killed in a disease outbreak.
The Castro regime in the past failed to report Dengue (1997) and Cholera (2012) outbreaks in Cuba that killed scores of Cubans. Jailing those who warned the world of the threat.  In 2017 the Cuban dictatorship failed to report thousands of Zika virus cases in 2017.

On November 29, 2018 The New York Times reported that the  Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), a division of the World Health Organization (WHO) “made about $75 million off the work of up to 10,000 Cuban doctors who earned substandard wages in Brazil.” A group of these Cuban medical doctors are now suing PAHO for the organization’s alleged role in human trafficking.

This may also raise new questions on the relationship between PAHO, Cuba and reporting not only on outbreaks but the healthcare statistics that present the regime in a positive light.

Without Fidel Castro, Cuba would be another normal country that would be reporting health statistics that were accurate because there would be both an independent press and civil society to keep the government honest. Both were destroyed by Fidel Castro and his dictatorship.