CubaBrief: Freedom House report on Latin American human rights and democracy activists. Update on remittances & consular help. New report on Havana Syndrome

Freedom House released their new report today, “Defending Latin American Human Rights and Democracy Activists” that states matter of factly that “this assessment’s findings point to different levels of commitment by countries to the protection of defenders in Latin America. First, there are countries with no government commitment to protection, such as Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, all classified as “Not Free” by Freedom House in its Freedom in the World report.” The Hill, in their article on the report, put it more succinctly: ” Freedom House says Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cuba have no government protections for HRDs.” The bulk of the report focuses on the deteriorating situation for human rights and pro-democracy defenders in both Venezuela and Nicaragua.

President Biden together with Germany’s Angela Merkel described Cuba as a “failed state”

President Joe Biden on July 15, 2021 described Cuba as a “failed state” and Politico reported that “he would not send remittances to the country right now because it’s ‘highly likely that the regime would confiscate remittances, or big chunks of it.'” The White House asked the Treasury Department and the State Department to figure out how to get remittances to Cubans without having them siphoned by the Cuban military. It has been a long process.

Today, National Post reported that U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Brian Nichols told “lawmakers Washington would send temporary-duty consular officers to the Havana embassy to increase visa processing there, another step that would loosen limits imposed under former President Donald Trump.” Back in November 2021 ” the White House had received remittances proposals but some had been sent back for further work to ensure that money sent by Cuban Americans to families on the island does not fall into the hands of Cuba’s Communist government,” said the Canadian publication.

Gen. Luis Alberto López Callejas could resolve the remittance problem.

Regime elites profiting off Cuban remittances, siphoning a good chunk of it for their coffers, are the reason the White House has not loosened regulations on remittances. In theory, one man, Gen. Luis Alberto López Callejas, could end the practice helping millions of Cubans.

Mary Anastasia O’Grady in her January 23, 2022 column in The Wall Street JournalWhy Won’t Joe Biden Take On Cuba? The president talks of troubles in the region but never mentions the heart of darkness,” discusses how the Castro regime’s elites capture remittances “Mr. López Callejas is the former son-in-law of Raúl Castro and owner of the Cuban military conglomerate GAESA. He wants the world to believe that cratering remittances are the fault of U.S. sanctions. In fact, full dollar remittances could restart tomorrow if he would allow Cubans to receive them.”

Finally, there is new reporting on the Havana Syndrome in The Washington Post, an expert panel, which was convened by U.S. intelligence agencies contradicting an earlier CIA report, that indicates that a foreign power may be involved in harming American diplomats.

National Post, February 3, 2022

White House decision awaited on Cuba remittances – U.S. official

WASHINGTON — The White House has received recommendations for easing the flow of remittances to Cuba that were severely restricted under the Trump administration and “we await their decision,” a senior U.S. State Department official said on Thursday.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Brian Nichols also told lawmakers Washington would send temporary-duty consular officers to the Havana embassy to increase visa processing there, another step that would loosen limits imposed under former President Donald Trump.

A senior U.S. official said in November that the White House had received remittances proposals but some had been sent back for further work to ensure that money sent by Cuban Americans to families on the island does not fall into the hands of Cuba’s Communist government. Nichols on Thursday did not provide any timetable for a decision.

President Joe Biden in July asked the Treasury Department and State Department to study the matter and report back on how to allow the flow of remittance payments, once a financial lifeline for many Cubans. (Reporting By Matt Spetalnick)

The Hill, February 3, 2022

Latin America among most dangerous regions for human rights defenders: report

By Lexi Lonas – 02/03/22 02:12 PM EST

© Associated Press/Jorge Saenz

Latin America is among the most dangerous regions for human rights defenders, according to a special report released by the nonprofit Freedom House on Wednesday.

The group found in 2020 more than three-quarters of human rights defenders (HRDs) killed around the world were in Latin America. 

The organization defines HRDs as social justice leaders, artists and those advocating for human rights and equal opportunities.

In Latin America, HRDs have been facing more harassment, intimidation, attacks and legislation banning their work in recent years, according to Freedom House.

The group said the pandemic has also given countries opportunities to enact “authoritarian measures under the guise of enforcing COVID-19 restrictions, to inhibit movement, curtail freedoms of expression and assembly, and implement militarized security policies.”

Conditions have been deteriorating particularly fast in some Latin American countries, with the report focusing on Venezuela and Nicaragua.

Venezuela has the second-largest external displacement crisis, with more than 5.6 million people fleeing the country, with a third of migrants going to Colombia. More than 100,000 Nicaraguans have left their country due to human rights abuses, migrating to Costa Rica, Mexico and Panama.

Freedom House says Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cuba have no government protections for HRDs. 

In general, HRDs in Latin American countries do not receive “emergency funds, physical security support, psychosocial and psycho-emotional support, medical assistance, digital security installation, support and training, legal advice and assistance for criminalization,” Freedom House said.

The Washington Post, February 2, 2022


External energy source may explain ‘Havana syndrome,’ panel finds, renewing questions about possible foreign attack

The finding by experts convened by U.S. intelligence agencies suggests that a foreign power could have mounted attacks on U.S. diplomats, intelligence officers and military personnel serving overseas.

In late 2016, U.S. personnel at the embassy in Havana, reported unexplained symptoms, including ringing in the ears and vertigo, that some experts say may have been caused by an external source of energy. (Yamil Lage/AFP/Getty Images)

By Shane Harris

Today at 3:24 p.m. EST

An external energy source may explain disorienting and sometimes debilitating symptoms suffered by U.S. government personnel, a panel of experts has found, reaching a conclusion that, while not definitive, suggests a foreign power could have mounted attacks on U.S. diplomats, intelligence officers and military personnel serving overseas.

The findings by the expert panel, which was convened by U.S. intelligence agencies, are the latest attempt to solve the years-long mystery of what, or who, is behind a constellation of symptoms known as Havana syndrome. In late 2016, personnel at the U.S. Embassy in Cuba’s capital reported a range of sensations including ringing and pressure in the ears, headaches and dizziness. Personnel in China later experienced similar symptoms, which have now been reported by hundreds of people serving at official posts around the world.

The vast majority of those cases have been attributed to medical conditions or other environmental factors, officials have said.

An earlier interim report from the CIA found that a foreign country is probably not mounting a global attack aimed at U.S. personnel. People who say they are victims of Havana syndrome strongly criticized the agency’s findings.

But the CIA report didn’t expressly rule out a foreign hand, at least behind some small number of cases for which investigators have found no cause or plausible explanation.

The expert panel’s finding was consistent with earlier conclusions from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, which found that “directed, pulsed radio frequency energy appears to be the most plausible mechanism in explaining these cases.”

That study was chaired by David Relman, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Stanford University, who also worked with the intelligence community’s panel of experts. The panel did not attribute any cases to a specific device or country.

The experts included people from within and outside the U.S. government, with expertise in science, medicine and engineering. They were given access to classified government information on reported incidents and trends, and met with individuals who shared their personal experiences and medical records, according to intelligence officials familiar with the panel’s work, who spoke on the condition of anonymity under ground rules established by the intelligence agencies.

As a starting point, the panel examined “the plausibility of five potential causal mechanisms” for the syndrome, which government officials have termed “anomalous health incidents.” These included acoustic signals, chemical and biological agents, ionizing radiation, natural and environmental factors, and radio frequency and other electromagnetic energy.

In the end, the experts determined that “pulsed electromagnetic energy, particularly in the radio-frequency range, plausibly explains the core characteristics” of the health incidents. That finding was not definitive, and “information gaps exist,” the panel wrote in a summary of its findings. But “there are several plausible pathways involving various forms of pulsed electromagnetic energy, each with its own requirements, limitations, and unknowns” that could be making people sick.

Sources of energy exist, the experts wrote, that “could generate the required stimulus” on the human body, and that could be concealed and have “moderate power requirements,” suggesting that the energy could come from a portable device.

Such a device would apparently not be common, but it could be effective. “Using nonstandard antennas and techniques, the signals could be propagated with low loss through air for tens to hundreds of meters, and with some loss, through most building materials,” the summary stated.

Some people who have reported the symptoms said they came on suddenly while they were in offices and hotel rooms. Others have reported the onset while they were outside.

“Ultrasound also plausibly explains the core characteristics,” the experts found, but probably only at close range. The experts’ analysis of ultrasound suggested it might not explain the cases where people fell ill inside a building.

“Ultrasound propagates poorly through air and building materials, restricting its applicability to scenarios in which the source is near the target,” the experts wrote.

State Dept. names new team to oversee ‘Havana Syndrome’ response

Skeptics of a directed-energy attack, perhaps with some form of weapon or surveillance device, have raised the possibility that Havana syndrome victims are actually suffering from some mass delusion or a psychological condition.

But the experts panel cast doubt on that hypothesis.

“Psychosocial factors alone cannot account for the core characteristics, although they may cause some other incidents or contribute to long-term symptoms,” they wrote.

Those core characteristics were helpful in narrowing down the investigation and focusing on aspects of symptoms that “were particularly difficult to explain through other means,” the experts wrote. There were four characteristics, including sound or pressure in the ears; “nearly simultaneous” symptoms such as vertigo, loss of balance and ear pain; “a strong sense of locality or directionality” to those symptoms; and the absence of any known environmental or medical conditions that could have caused them.

The panel acknowledged that some of these symptoms are common in known medical conditions. But the combination of all four “is distinctly unusual and unreported elsewhere in the medical literature, and so far have not been associated with a specific neurological abnormality.”

What’s more, the “location dependence,” or the way symptoms can appear suddenly, and go away quickly, argues for a “stimulus that is spatially and temporally discrete.” All those signs appear to point to some source of energy that is aimed at someone and causes the effects people experienced, the summary shows

An advocacy group of people who say they were the victims of an attack said the new report “reinforces the need for the intelligence community and the broader U.S. government to redouble their efforts to fully understand the causes” of the incidents.

Unanswered questions loom over Biden administration push to strengthen ‘Havana Syndrome’ response

In a joint statement, two top U.S. intelligence officials said the investigation into the cause of the health incidents will continue.

“The U.S. government remains committed to providing access to care for those who need it, and we will continue to share as much information as possible with our workforce and the American public as our efforts continue. Nothing is more important than the well-being and safety of our colleagues,” Avril Haines, the director of national intelligence, and William J. Burns, the director of the CIA, said in a statement.

While investigators have not settled on a cause for the illness, what’s clear is that the overwhelming majority of people who reported symptoms were not the victims of an attack.

Since the first cases were reported at the embassy in Havana in 2016, government investigators have reviewed more than 1,000 cases of anomalous health incidents, a senior CIA official told reporters in January.

The majority of cases could be attributed to a preexisting medical condition or environmental or other factors, the CIA official said. “A few dozen” of those incidents, which the official called “the toughest cases,” could not be explained and would receive further scrutiny.

People familiar with the CIA’s investigation, as well as the work of the expert panel, said that last year, after officials began to encourage anyone suffering from symptoms to report them, a flood of people came forward, most of whom turned out to have some explicable illness or cause behind their symptoms. That kept researchers busy trying to separate wheat from chaff, and ultimately they have zeroed in on that handful of cases that have so far stumped investigators.

The intelligence officials familiar with the panel’s work declined to say how many cases they examined. But the remaining few that have stumped investigators may hold the best chance for ultimately attributing the syndrome to a specific device or country.